Suzuki Equator (2009 – 2012) vs Nissan Navara / Frontier King Cab (2009 – 2018): specs compared
Both offer around 261 hp at most. The Nissan Navara / Frontier King Cab uses less fuel, from 9.8 L/100 km against 13.4 L/100 km. The Suzuki Equator is the lighter car, from 1,672 kg against 2,072 kg.
| Specification |
Suzuki
Equator
2009 – 2012
|
Nissan
Navara / Frontier King Cab
2009 – 2018
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Japan | Japan |
| Documented years | 2009 – 2012 | 2009 – 2018 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Diesel |
| Drive | RWD · AWD | AWD |
| Gearbox | Automatic · Manual | Automatic · Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 152 – 264 hp | 150 – 264 hp |
| Torque | 232 – 381 Nm | 381 – 403 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | — | 8.3 – 11.8 s |
| Top speed | — | 170 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 13.4 L/100 km | 9.8 – 14.3 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,248 mm | 5,220 mm |
| Width | 1,849 mm | 1,849 mm |
| Height | 1,770 – 1,781 mm | 1,783 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 3,198 mm |
| Curb weight | 1,672 – 1,964 kg | 2,072 – 2,112 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
Suzuki Equator vs Honda OdysseySuzuki Equator vs Honda RidgelineSuzuki Equator vs Nissan QuestSuzuki Equator vs Mazda CX-9Nissan Navara / Frontier King Cab vs Honda OdysseyNissan Navara / Frontier King Cab vs Honda PilotNissan Navara / Frontier King Cab vs Honda RidgelineNissan Navara / Frontier King Cab vs Mazda CX-9