Mazda CX-9 (2009 – 2012) vs Honda Accord Crosstour (2009 – 2013): specs compared
Both offer around 273 hp at most. The Honda Accord Crosstour uses less fuel, from 9.8 L/100 km against 13.0 L/100 km. It is the lighter car, from 1,747 kg against 1,964 kg. At 5,090 mm, the Mazda CX-9 is 91 mm longer than the Honda Accord Crosstour.
| Specification |
Mazda
CX-9
2009 – 2012
|
Honda
Accord Crosstour
2009 – 2013
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Japan | Japan |
| Documented years | 2009 – 2012 | 2009 – 2013 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 2 | 3 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Drive | AWD | FWD · AWD |
| Gearbox | Automatic | Automatic |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 277 hp | 194 – 275 hp |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 220 – 344 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 10.1 s | — |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | — |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 13.0 L/100 km | 9.8 – 11.8 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,090 mm | 4,999 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,897 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,669 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,797 mm |
| Curb weight | 1,964 – 2,040 kg | 1,747 – 1,846 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
Mazda CX-9 vs Honda RidgelineMazda CX-9 vs Toyota SiennaMazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen RoutanMazda CX-9 vs Nissan Navara / Frontier King CabMazda CX-9 vs Suzuki EquatorHonda Accord Crosstour vs Chevrolet Colorado Double CabHonda Accord Crosstour vs Chevrolet Colorado Extended CabHonda Accord Crosstour vs Chevrolet Colorado Regular Cab