Jeep Commander (2005 – 2007) vs Land Rover Range Rover (2005 – 2009): specs compared
The Land Rover Range Rover is the more powerful of the two, with up to 396 hp against 334 hp. The Jeep Commander uses less fuel, from 10.8 L/100 km against 11.1 L/100 km. It is the lighter car, from 2,305 kg against 2,440 kg. At 4,950 mm, the Land Rover Range Rover is 162 mm longer than the Jeep Commander.
| Specification |
Jeep
Commander
2005 – 2007
|
Land Rover
Range Rover
2005 – 2009
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | United States | United Kingdom |
| Documented years | 2005 – 2007 | 2005 – 2009 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel | Diesel, Petrol | Diesel, Petrol |
| Drive | AWD | AWD |
| Gearbox | Automatic | Automatic |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 218 – 334 hp | 177 – 396 hp |
| Torque | 409 – 510 Nm | 390 – 640 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.4 – 9.5 s | 7.5 – 13.6 s |
| Top speed | 180 – 208 km/h | 179 – 210 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 10.8 – 15.5 L/100 km | 11.1 – 16.0 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,788 mm | 4,950 mm |
| Width | 2,261 mm | 1,961 mm |
| Height | 1,826 mm | 1,821 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,781 mm | 2,880 mm |
| Curb weight | 2,305 – 2,355 kg | 2,440 – 2,522 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
Jeep Commander vs Chevrolet TrailBlazerJeep Commander vs Ford ExplorerJeep Commander vs Mercedes-Benz M-KlasseLand Rover Range Rover vs Chevrolet TrailBlazerLand Rover Range Rover vs Mercedes-Benz M-KlasseLand Rover Range Rover vs Mercedes-Benz G-Klasse AMGLand Rover Range Rover vs Mercedes-Benz GL-Klasse