Ferrari 288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari (1987 – 1992) vs RUF CTR Yellowbird (1987 – 1996): specs compared
The Ferrari 288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari is the more powerful of the two, with up to 478 hp against 469 hp. The RUF CTR Yellowbird is quicker, reaching 100 km/h in 3.9 s against 4.1 s. It has the higher top speed: 342 km/h against 323 km/h. The Ferrari 288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari uses less fuel, from 12.4 L/100 km against 14.9 L/100 km. The RUF CTR Yellowbird is the lighter car, from 1,150 kg against 1,250 kg. At 4,430 mm, the Ferrari 288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari is 140 mm longer than the RUF CTR Yellowbird.
| Specification |
Ferrari
288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari
1987 – 1992
|
RUF
CTR Yellowbird
1987 – 1996
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Italy | Germany |
| Documented years | 1987 – 1992 | 1987 – 1996 |
| Body style | — | Coupé |
| Variants | 1 | 1 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Drive | RWD | RWD |
| Gearbox | Manual | Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 478 hp | 469 hp |
| Torque | 577 Nm | 553 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.1 s | 3.9 s |
| Top speed | 323 km/h | 342 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 12.4 L/100 km | 14.9 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,430 mm | 4,290 mm |
| Width | 1,981 mm | 1,775 mm |
| Height | 1,130 mm | 1,311 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,451 mm | 2,272 mm |
| Curb weight | 1,250 kg | 1,150 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
Ferrari 288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari vs Porsche 959Ferrari 288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari vs Lamborghini DiabloFerrari 288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari vs Lamborghini CountachRUF CTR Yellowbird vs Ferrari 288 GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrariRUF CTR Yellowbird vs Lamborghini CountachRUF CTR Yellowbird vs Lamborghini LM 002RUF CTR Yellowbird vs Porsche 959RUF CTR Yellowbird vs Mercedes-Benz SL-Klasse