DR MOTOR dr cityCROSS (2013 – 2016) vs Caterham Seven 160 (2013): specs compared
Both offer around 83 hp at most. The Caterham Seven 160 is quicker, reaching 100 km/h in 6.7 s against 12.5 s. It has the higher top speed: 161 km/h against 156 km/h. It uses less fuel, from 4.9 L/100 km against 5.5 L/100 km. It is the lighter car, from 490 kg against 1,065 kg.
| Specification |
DR
MOTOR dr cityCROSS
2013 – 2016
|
Caterham
Seven 160
2013
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Origin | Italy | United Kingdom |
| Documented years | 2013 – 2016 | 2013 |
| Body style | — | — |
| Variants | 1 | 1 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Drive | FWD | RWD |
| Gearbox | Manual | Manual |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 83 hp | 81 hp |
| Torque | 114 Nm | 107 Nm |
| 0–100 km/h | 12.5 s | 6.7 s |
| Top speed | 156 km/h | 161 km/h |
| Economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 5.5 L/100 km | 4.9 L/100 km |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 3,886 mm | — |
| Width | 1,623 mm | — |
| Height | 1,585 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,339 mm | — |
| Curb weight | 1,065 kg | 490 kg |
Ranges cover all variants of each car. The highlight marks the best version per row.
More comparisons
DR MOTOR dr cityCROSS vs Dacia Sandero StepwayDR MOTOR dr cityCROSS vs Hyundai i10DR MOTOR dr cityCROSS vs Renault ZOEDR MOTOR dr cityCROSS vs Fiat Panda 4X4Caterham Seven 160 vs Mitsubishi Space StarCaterham Seven 160 vs Volkswagen e-UP!Caterham Seven 160 vs Smart Electric DriveCaterham Seven 160 vs Smart Electric Drive